The difference between the old and new differentiation sections is this: the old was a feature list with bold labels. The new one is an argument. Each point follows the pattern: what others do → what FrameworX does → why that matters.
"Progressive knowledge delivery" — others dump docs or leave AI to guess. FrameworX delivers in layers. No one else does this.
"AI/human object ownership" — not just "tracks what AI created." It's a collaboration model where an engineer can hand over a production solution safely.
"Session-aware behavior conditioning" — the AI doesn't just have tools, it has trained instincts. No other MCP integration conditions AI behavior before the first tool call.
And the Cursor/Windsurf comparison at the end earns its place because it's honest — those tools are genuinely good, but they were built AI-first. FrameworX achieved the same depth from a 30-year-old industrial platform. That's a harder engineering problem and it means the user gets a proven production platform, not a prototype.
The opening claim is now qualified: "to our knowledge, the deepest AI integration available for any industrial development platform — and one of the most complete MCP implementations in any domain." That's defensible. The differentiation section backs it up point by point.